A routine joint GMP inspection was carried out by the Health and Youth Care Inspectorate (IGJ, The Netherlands) and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD, United Kingdom) from 2 to 5 September 2025. Products in scope were Innovax (ILT-IBD/ILT/ND-IBD/ND-ILT), AE/Pox and DHPPi (all veterinary vaccines) and Rabies bulk antigen. The inspection resulted in 8 (eight) Major deficiencies and 10 (ten) Other deficiencies. IGJ and VMD jointly concluded that the Company is not in compliance with GMP, based on the amount and severity of the deficiencies. The Major deficiencies were the following: 1. The company had failed to – depending on the product - adequately or completely fulfil its obligation to incorporate the requirements of the revised Annex 1 of the GMP Guideline. Annex 1 was not implemented for Rabies antigen (pending transfer of production foreseen for 2027), Innovax (as not being manufactured) and for DHPPi just prior to a campaign in 2025. An initial GAP analysis could not be shown. 2. The capacity for continuous improvement is insufficient. This was evident from the recurrence of various (significant) deficiencies of the last EU GMP inspection in 2022. This includes Major observations on Environmental Monitoring and Aseptic Process Simulation, as well as Others from 2022 that were now Major deficiencies (Good Documentation Practices, Aseptic behaviour). 3. Precautions to minimize the risks on contamination were deficient. The company did not have a CCS for products Rabies and Innovax, and a CCS for DHPPi that was not a holistic overview and missing several elements. Moreover, processes for cleaning, disinfection, and clean hold time of primary packaging materials were not appropriately defined; premises failed in pressure differences, non-cascaded airlocks. 4. Aseptic behavior and (gowning) practices were deficient in many cases and corresponding procedures were not followed. Many examples were observed for e.g. (de)gowning practices, hand washing, movements in grade B cleanrooms, changing gloves, not changing wipes for disinfection – some of these examples not following the corresponding procedures. 5. Maintenance, repair and housekeeping activities across the site were deficient, as highlighted by many examples. In many cases rust, dirt and dust was observed in production facilities and gowning rooms; cleanrooms were not orderly; personal items (e.g. backpack, headphones) were found in grade D rooms; panels, walls, seals, accessories were damaged in many cases; clean status of rooms was not evidenced by the appearance of rooms. 6. The company’s environmental monitoring (EM) programme was deficient. Examples relate to not measuring non-viable particles in grade A, inconsistent approach for measuring locations, missing risk assessments, not following procedures for measurements, too limited personnel monitoring, too limited room monitoring, missing limits and missing justifications for limits and selection of house isolates, missing sampling after critical interventions and missing investigations for excursions. 7. The design and operation of the aseptic process simulation program failed to provide adequate sterility assurance. Examples include the possibility for a compliant APS despite growth, process design that does not take into account filling time, campaigns, intervention frequency, consideration of all worst cases, equipment holding time; in the execution elements could not be verified (e.g. maximum amount of people in cleanrooms, attendance, correct EM monitoring and roles of involved people). 8. Good Documentation Practices were not applied in many cases. This includes uncontrolled, outdated and obsolete documents, procedures with missing/incorrect elements, insufficient controlled storage and retention of documents, documents not being reviewed in time; wrong, missing and changed data and signatures, documents that were not updated according to changes. Action taken/proposed by the NCA: Withdrawal, of current valid GMP certificate No. NL/V 22/2043225V1 Certificate NL/V 22/2043225V1 (an extended GMP certificate after 3-year expiry of the previous certificate) is withdrawn. Recall of batches already released Consideration of recall, following NCA assessment of potential quality defects vs. supply restriction. A direct, critical product risk has not been identified. However, the nature and cumulative risk of the combined deficiencies could have lead to an inferior product. Authorities are recommended to assess the criticality of the products before considering recall (e.g. rabies antigen). Based on information from the company the following applies for products: - Innovax (all varieties): not manufactured in this site after September 2022. - AE/POX: currently manufactured. - DHPPi: manufactured in campaign between March-July 2025. - Rabies bulk antigen: currently manufactured. Prohibition of supply The company should not supply to the EU market whilst the NCS in is force with the exemption of product that is considered critical for the market. A successful reinspection is recommended before full market supply is resumed.
Inspection Record
Intervet Inc. — EU GMP NCR (EudraGMDP) Findings
View the regulator's official source The source document is always the basis for judgement.
Findings
1Documentation and records
About this record
Extracted automatically from the document EMA (Europe) published on 2026-05-19. The source is available at the link above.
This is a record of that moment. Inspection findings are usually followed by the company's response and corrective action, but this page does not know how that turned out. Do not read it as the current state; check the regulator's official announcements for the latest status.
Translation and classification are automated and may differ in nuance from the source.
