Inspection Record

Specialty Process Labs LLC — FDA Warning Letter Findings

US FDAPublished 2022-05-17 5 findingsQuality unit oversightLaboratory and QC controlsComputer system validation

View the regulator's official source The source document is always the basis for judgement.

Findings

1Quality unit oversight

Failure of your quality unit to exercise its responsibility to ensure the API and intermediates manufactured at your facility are in compliance with CGMP. Your firm’s quality unit (QU) failed to perform routine QU functions to ensure drug manufacturing operations were adequate. For example, your QU failed to: Establish and maintain adequate evaluation procedures for third-party laboratories that are utilized for finished drug testing, such as fat analysis, inorganic iodides…

2Laboratory and QC controls

Failure to ensure that, for each batch of intermediates and API, appropriate laboratory tests are conducted to determine conformance to specifications. You failed to perform laboratory testing to ensure that the thyroid, USP API lots held for extended periods of time met all quality attributes prior to blending into your final API blend. For example, lot (b)(4) , tested February 5, 2019, was blended, without retest, into finished thyroid, USP API, lot B20361-FS on February…

3Quality unit oversight

Failure to demonstrate that your manufacturing process can reproducibly manufacture an intermediate and API meeting its predetermined quality attributes. You failed to adequately validate your thyroid, USP API manufacturing processes. Specifically, there were several processing steps prior to the final blend, such as (b)(4) , and (b)(4) , that you did not include in your process validation. Your quality unit personnel stated that you planned to validate these processes in…

4Laboratory and QC controls

Failure to ensure that all test procedures are scientifically sound and appropriate to ensure that your intermediate and API conform to established standards of quality. The microbiological test methods used for determining the microbial attributes of your thyroid, USP API prior to release were deficient in the following: Growth promotion studies were not documented or conducted for either purchased or inhouse media. Method suitability and validation was not established or…

5Computer system validation

Failure to exercise sufficient controls over computerized systems to prevent unauthorized access or changes to data, and failure to have adequate controls to prevent omission of data. During the inspection, our investigator observed that many of your computerized systems lacked sufficient controls to ensure the integrity of the data being generated. For example: Our investigator found “System/Administrator” as the only user role for your (b)(4) software. There were no…

About this record

Extracted automatically from the document US FDA published on 2022-05-17. The source is available at the link above.

This is a record of that moment. Inspection findings are usually followed by the company's response and corrective action, but this page does not know how that turned out. Do not read it as the current state; check the regulator's official announcements for the latest status.

Translation and classification are automated and may differ in nuance from the source.

Specialty Process Labs LLC company profile — full history US FDA documents, 2022 Go to Findings search