By Category

US FDA Validation and qualification findings

by this agency in this category 119 findings drawn from 110 published documents. The most recent cases are below; the full set is in search.

See all US FDA Validation and qualification findings

Companies with the most findings

Recent findings

US FDA Thomas Brunner Hygiene GmbH 2026-08-04

Specifically, your antiperspirant products are labeled to contain aluminum chlorohydrate 10%, and aluminum chloride 10%, as active ingredients. While each active ingredient is individually permitted by M019.10, these active ingredients are not permitted when used in this combination (or any other combination) in a single antiperspirant drug product. Thus, your syNeo antiperspirant products do not comply with the applicable conditions specified in M019 and have not otherwise been found GRASE. 3 Accordingly, these products are new drugs within the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(p), and there is no basis under section 505G of the FD&C Act under which these products would be legally marketed without an approved application. Because there are no applications in effect for these products, these products are unapproved new drugs. The introduction or delivery for introduction of these unapproved new drug products into interstate commerce violates sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(a) and 331(d). Misbranded Drug Violations Additionally, your syNeo antiperspirant products are misbranded under section 502(ee) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 352(ee), because these products are nonprescription drugs subject to section 505G of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355h, but do not comply with the requirements for marketing under that section and are not the subject of an application approved under section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355. The introduction or delivery for introduction of a misbranded drug into interstate commerce violates section 301(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(a). Consultant Based on the nature of the violations we identified at your firm, you should engage a consultant qualified as set forth in 21 CFR 211.34 to assist your firm in meeting CGMP requirements. Your use of a consultant does not relieve your firm’s obligation to comply with CGMP. Your firm’s executive management remains responsible for resolving all deficiencies and systemic flaws to ensure ongoing CGMP compliance. Quality Systems Your firm’s quality systems are inadequate. For help implementing quality systems and risk management approaches to meet the requirements of CGMP regulations 21 CFR, parts 210 and 211, see FDA’s guidance documents Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations at https://www.fda.gov/media/71023/download; Q9(R1) Quality Risk Management at https://www.fda.gov/media/167721/download; and Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System at https://www.fda.gov/media/71553/download.

View official source
US FDA Inotiv Inc. 2026-01-16

Source records for method validation experiments of long-term stability (validation report #1000-091480-2), dilution integrity, stability in matrix and ion suppression (validation report #1000-091480-1), do not document that lithium heparinized human lysed whole blood was utilized as the matrix.

See every finding in this document View official source

Other agencies

These findings are a record of the moment each document was published. Inspection findings are usually followed by the company's response and corrective action, but this page does not know how that turned out — do not read them as the current state; check the regulator's official announcements for the latest status. Counts are measured from public data as of 2026-09-04, and findings are extracted automatically from the regulator's published documents. “View official source” on each case links directly to that document.