By Category

Process validation Findings

in this category 583 findings drawn from 511 published documents. The most recent cases are below; the full set is in search.

See all Process validation findings

Which agency cited it

US FDA 581
Health Canada 2

Companies with the most findings

Recent findings

US FDA Eugia Pharma Specialities Limited 2026-10-19

Control procedures are not established which monitor the output and validate the performance of those manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability in the characteristics of in-process material and the drug product.

See every finding in this document View the regulator's official source
US FDA Micro Labs Limited 2026-10-19

Control procedures are not established which monitor the output and validate the performance ofthose manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability in the characteristics of in- process material and the drug product.

View the regulator's official source
US FDA Hanlim Pharm Co., Ltd. 2026-10-13

Your firm failed to have separate or defined areas or such other control systems necessary to prevent contamination or mix-ups (21 CFR 211.42(c)), and your firm failed to establish and follow adequate control procedures to monitor the output and to validate the performance of those manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability in the characteristics of in-process material and the drug product (21 CFR 211.110(a)). Inadequate Equipment Cleaning and Sterilization Your aseptic processing operation is inadequately designed to prevent contamination of your sterile (b)(4) drug products. For example, you did not appropriately sterilize critical container-closure contact surfaces, such as the (b)(4) , bowl, track and (b)(4) equipment, as well as the (b)(4) , bowl, track, and (b)(4) equipment. Instead, you wipe these surfaces with sporicidal disinfectants. To ensure sterility, it is imperative that only sterilized equipment comes into direct contact with the sterile formulation, containers, and closures. Inadequate Environmental Monitoring You also failed to ensure adequate environmental monitoring (EM) of classified areas used for aseptic production of sterile (b)(4) drug products. The EM program used to monitor critical areas was deficient. You failed to demonstrate that the locations and frequencies established for viable air sampling, surface monitoring, and non-viable particulate sampling were adequately justified and sufficient to promptly detect contamination risks. For example, sampling was not adequate to evaluate the environment in proximity to containers and closures, nor on the surfaces of barriers facing your ISO 5 (Grade A) spaces. Because you had not established a sufficient EM program, you lacked evidence of daily environmental control that is foundational to assuring sterility of aseptically processed products. A vigilant, ongoing personnel and environmental monitoring program is essential to detect and respond to potential product contamination hazards in your manufacturing environment in a timely manner. Loss of environmental control in an aseptic manufacturing facility can ultimately pose a serious hazard to patients. Inadequate Visual Inspection Program Your visual inspection program for sterile (b)(4) drug products was deficient. Your firm failed to routinely categorize defects as part of your visual inspection program. In addition, you did not establish appropriate acceptance criteria. Notably, your process has experienced significant defect rates. It is important that visible particulate contamination is appropriately evaluated. When categorizing visible particles, extrinsic or foreign matter should receive special attention, as it may indicate possible insanitary or microbial contamination. Sterile manufacturing operations should be designed to prevent foreign contaminants, and such contamination should trigger a thorough investigation and appropriate CAPA. In your response, you state you will assess your (b)(4) filling line and improve its design. You state you will also revise cleaning and disinfection procedures, and conduct an EM risk assessment and subsequent EM performance qualification. Additionally, your response commits to improvements in visual inspection equipment, with better categorization of rejects and established acceptance criteria. Your response is inadequate. It fails to systematically address the need for robust aseptic processing operations and collection of more meaningful data to support aseptic operational control. It also lacks details describing how you will ensure use of sterilizable equipment in the future and conduct EM with sufficient frequency at locations where significant activity or exposure occurs during aseptic production. Additionally, you failed to provide the details of your improved visual inspection program, including how you will ensure thorough investigations, when appropriate. In response to this letter, provide: A comprehensive, independent risk assessment of all contamination hazards with respect to your aseptic processes, equipment, and facilities, including but not limited to: o All human interactions within the ISO 5 area (e.g., risk reduction or elimination of (b)(4) interventions wherever possible) o Equipment suitability (e.g., reliability, capability, ergonomics, placement) and sufficient cleanroom space o Air quality in the ISO 5 area and surrounding room including, but not limited to, air volume and flow o Facility layout o Personnel Flow and Material Flow (movement throughout all rooms used to conduct and support sterile operations, and all material transfers) o Disinfection practices and procedures o Specific CAPA recommendations that will comprehensively address the design and control hazards identified in the risk assessment A detailed remediation plan with timelines to address the findings of the contamination hazards risk assessment. Describe specific tangible improvements to be made to aseptic processing operation design and control at your facility and explain how this CAPA plan will robustly remediate your deficient sterile manufacturing operations. Include comprehensive changes to the design of (b)(4) your aseptic processing lines and cleanrooms. Also, describe your plans for qualification and validation of your extensively remediated operations. A CAPA plan, based on the retrospective assessment of your cleaning and disinfection program, that includes appropriate remediations to your cleaning and disinfection processes and practices, and timelines for completion.…

See every finding in this document View the regulator's official source

Other categories

These findings are a record of the moment each document was published. Inspection findings are usually followed by the company's response and corrective action, but this page does not know how that turned out — do not read them as the current state; check the regulator's official announcements for the latest status. Counts are measured from public data as of 2026-10-20, and findings are extracted automatically from the regulator's published documents. “View official source” on each case links directly to that document.

Weekly Newsletter

Get new findings like these every Monday

Every Monday we email the week's new findings and actions from the FDA, EMA, Health Canada and MFDS. Each one links to its record on our site, where you'll find the regulator's original document. We'll also let you know when the site gains new features. Unsubscribe any time with one click.

See recent findings first

Sent every Monday · a confirmation email follows when you subscribe · unsubscribe from the footer of any email.